LandingScore Leaderboard

linear.app

β€œLinear's landing page is a beautiful product brochure that forgets to sell anything β€” spec-heavy, human-light, number-free.”

What we think it is: AI-powered project management system for modern software product teams.

62 / 100 Β· Grade D
Clarity72
Copy48
Call to Action38
Pricing65
Trust55
Shareability70

The 3 leaks costing them the most

1 Zero numbers in headlines β€” adjectives everywhere

Why it hurts: The H1 and every H2 are pure adjectives and vibes: 'new standard', 'self-driving', 'high velocity'. numeralsInHeadings = 0 confirms this. Weak word count is a staggering 104. Visitors cannot answer 'how much better?' from any headline.

Fix: Rewrite at least two headlines with concrete numbers. E.g. 'Ship features 3Γ— faster with AI agents' or 'Cuts triage time from 2 hours to 8 minutes'. Pull a real metric from customer data.

2 CTA soup β€” no single next step

Why it hurts: The ctaLabels array contains 20+ items including nav items, product UI labels ('Inbox', 'My issues', 'Reviews', 'Pulse'), changelog entries, and version strings treated as CTAs. There is no dominant, unmissable primary button. 'Open app', 'Log in', and 'Sign up' all compete silently.

Fix: Make one CTA the visual hero β€” 'Start for free' or 'Get Linear free' β€” in the accent color, above the fold, nowhere else until the pricing section. Remove all UI chrome labels from CTA surface area.

3 No founder visibility and thin empathy before the sell

Why it hurts: avatarsGuess=386 suggests customer logos/avatars but no founder face or signed human voice is detectable. The page leaps directly from tagline to product screenshots with zero acknowledgment of the pain teams feel before using Linear. 'Issue tracking is dead' is the closest thing β€” and it's buried as a small aside.

Fix: Add a 2-sentence founder note above the fold or in the hero subhead that names the specific pain: 'We built Linear because sprint planning was eating our Mondays.' A face + 30 words of empathy doubles perceived trust.

All 31 principles, scored

1. No free plan β—‹ 2/3

No mention of a free plan in pricing signals ('mentionsFreePlan': false, 'mentionsFreeTrial': false). Pricing exists but no 'free forever' tier is advertised β€” good. However no free trial mention is a missed softener.

Fix: Add a 'free trial, no credit card' line near the primary CTA to reduce signup friction without giving away a free tier.

2. Three colors max βœ— 0/3

distinctColorCount = 82. Eighty-two distinct colors detected. The product UI screenshots, code diffs, and changelog entries bleed every color of the rainbow onto the page. Brand discipline is gone.

Fix: Constrain hero and marketing sections to black, white, and one accent (Linear's purple). Reserve colorful screenshots to a single contained demo section with a neutral frame.

3. Numbers over adjectives βœ— 0/3

numeralsInHeadings = 0 and weakWordCount = 104. Headlines use 'new standard', 'world-class', 'high velocity', 'modern teams' β€” zero falsifiable numbers anywhere in the headline hierarchy.

Fix: Replace at least two H2s with numbered claims sourced from customer data: 'Closes 40% more bugs per sprint' or 'Used by 10,000+ product teams'.

4. Shareable footer β–³ 1/3

Footer content is not visible in the extracted text. Given the brand's premium positioning, it likely has legal links and social icons rather than a memorable hook or wit.

Fix: Add a one-liner to the footer that earns a screenshot: something like 'Linear: because your backlog deserves better than a spreadsheet.'

5. OG image like a thumbnail β—‹ 2/3

hasOgImage = true. ogTitle 'Linear – The system for product development' and ogDescription 'Purpose-built for planning and building products with AI agents' are clear. Not click-bait compelling but functional.

Fix: Make the OG image show a striking product moment (e.g. an agent closing 10 issues) rather than a wordmark β€” thumbnail stops the scroll.

6. One idea per screen β—‹ 2/3

The page is structured into five numbered feature sections (Intake, Plan, Build, Diffs, Monitor) each with a headline and demo. Structure is good. However the hero screen tries to carry H1 + sub + product UI + 'Issue tracking is dead' hook + changelog teaser simultaneously.

Fix: Strip the hero to headline + one-line sub + CTA only. Move the animated product UI to the next scroll position.

7. Fifth-grader headline β–³ 1/3

H1: 'The product development system for teams and agents' β€” 'product development system' is jargon a fifth-grader would skip. 'Agents' without context is abstract.

Fix: Try: 'Build software faster β€” with AI doing half the work.' Simple words, clear benefit.

8. Hard paywall β–³ 1/3

Nav shows 'Sign up' and 'Open app' before pricing. The funnel appears to collect signup before or alongside payment. mentionsOneTime = false, no trial callout visible.

Fix: Route the primary CTA to a pricing page or show pricing inline, letting users choose a paid plan before account creation.

9. Copy only you could write β—‹ 2/3

'Issue tracking is dead' and 'A new species of product tool' are distinctive and couldn't be copy-pasted to Jira or Asana without irony. The vehicle-state iOS example in the demo is hyper-specific. But feature sub-headers ('Built for purpose', 'Designed for speed') are generic.

Fix: Extend the specificity of the demo narrative into the feature copy. 'Karri's Slack message became a tracked issue in 2 minutes' is better than 'Turn conversations into actionable issues'.

10. Show before explain βœ“ 3/3

hasDemoEmbed = true and imageCount = 31. The hero section immediately shows a live product UI with real issue data, agent interactions, and code β€” before any feature explanation.

11. Does one thing β—‹ 2/3

Linear is product development β€” issues, roadmaps, AI agents, code review, analytics. It's broader than one thing, but all features orbit one problem: shipping software. The page doesn't feel scattered.

Fix: Tighten the hero subhead to name the single outcome: 'Ship software faster' rather than listing five sub-features.

12. Popcorn pricing β—‹ 2/3

Dollar amounts $2.9, $200, $1.25, $82 suggest multiple tiers. Pricing nav exists. Cannot confirm exact tier count from signals but the price points suggest 3-4 tiers β€” borderline acceptable.

Fix: If there are more than three tiers, collapse or hide the edge cases. Show Good/Better/Best prominently.

13. Rides a wave βœ“ 3/3

'Purpose-built for planning and building products with AI agents' and 'Designed for the AI era' β€” Linear is explicitly surfing the AI coding agent wave (Codex, Cursor, Copilot integrations visible in CTAs). Timely.

14. Customer-language copy β—‹ 2/3

The Slack thread demo ('Has anyone been looking into the iOS startup performance issues?', 'Feels like we could render sooner') uses real developer language. But headline copy like 'sets a new standard' and 'restores momentum' is marketing-speak.

Fix: Pull one real quote from a customer about their daily pain and use it verbatim in a subhead near the hero.

15. Visible founder βœ— 0/3

No founder photo, video, or signed note is detectable in the extracted signals or visible text. avatarsGuess=386 likely reflects customer avatars/logos, not founders.

Fix: Add a small founder photo + one sentence below the hero: 'Built by Karri, Jori, and Tuomas β€” engineers who were tired of Jira.'

16. Pricing impossible to miss βœ“ 3/3

'Pricing' is in the top nav (navLabels includes 'Pricing'). Dollar amounts are present on the page. Easy to find.

17. Memorable headline β–³ 1/3

'The product development system for teams and agents' is descriptive but forgettable β€” it reads like a category definition, not a headline you'd repeat at lunch. 'Issue tracking is dead' is more memorable but isn't the H1.

Fix: Promote 'Issue tracking is dead. Welcome to Linear.' as the H1 β€” it's bold, recalls the next day, and sets up the whole narrative.

18. Emotional headline β–³ 1/3

No headline triggers a clear emotional response β€” no laugh, no 'wow', no fear. 'Issue tracking is dead' is the closest to emotional resonance but is positioned as a minor callout, not the hero.

Fix: Lead with the provocation: 'Issue tracking is dead.' One sentence. Let it land before explaining what Linear is.

19. Never seen before β—‹ 2/3

The inline code diff review inside a project management tool, and AI agents listed alongside human teammates in the same interface, feels genuinely novel. The page has visual moments not seen on Jira/Asana/Notion.

Fix: Lean harder into the diff review feature β€” it's the most 'never seen before' element and deserves more above-fold real estate.

20. Hero sells alone β—‹ 2/3

Hero has a headline, subhead ('Purpose-built for planning and building products. Designed for the AI era.'), and CTAs ('Sign up', 'Open app'). Who it's for (teams + agents) is present. Why buy is vague β€” no outcome stated. Functional but not compelling alone.

Fix: Add one outcome sentence to the subhead: 'Ship 3Γ— faster by letting AI handle triage, drafting, and code review.' Hero then sells itself.

21. Empathy before selling β–³ 1/3

'Issue tracking is dead' hints at the pain but it's a throwaway line with a link, not an empathy-first narrative. The page jumps straight into product features without sitting with the developer's frustration.

Fix: Open with two sentences of pain before the product pitch: 'Your team spends Monday in triage. By Friday, half those issues are stale. Linear fixes that.'

22. One call to action βœ— 0/3

ctaLabels contains 20+ items. 'Open app', 'Log in', 'Sign up', plus product UI labels treated as interactive elements. There is no single dominant CTA β€” the page diffuses intent across dozens of clickable surfaces.

Fix: Pick one CTA ('Get Linear free') and make it the only accented button in the hero. Secondary actions (Log in, Docs) stay as plain text links.

23. Memorable name βœ“ 3/3

'Linear' is one word, common English, implies straight-line progress and clarity. No explanation required. Domain is linear.app β€” clean.

24. Sells a desire, not a feature β–³ 1/3

Feature copy dominates: 'Structural diffs', 'AI workflows at its core', 'Git automations'. Desire copy is sparse β€” 'ship with high velocity' is close but 'velocity' is still an engineering word, not a human desire.

Fix: Reframe each section around the desire: 'Go home on time' (speed), 'Stop getting blamed for missed deadlines' (status), 'Know what your team is actually doing' (control).

25. Try before buying β—‹ 2/3

hasDemoEmbed = true with rich interactive-looking UI screenshots and code diffs. Visitors can observe realistic product output. However there's no live sandbox or 'try this' interactive moment β€” it's observational, not participatory.

Fix: Add a single interactive element: let visitors type a fake issue title and watch an 'agent' auto-label it. 30 seconds of play converts better than 30 screenshots.

26. No weak words βœ— 0/3

weakWordCount = 104. The copy is saturated with unquantified claims: 'world-class product teams', 'new standard', 'high velocity', 'noise'. None are falsifiable.

Fix: Audit every 'world-class', 'modern', 'powerful', and replace with a number or a named customer outcome. Target under 20 weak words.

27. No subscription β–³ 1/3

mentionsPerMonth = true, mentionsOneTime = false. Linear is a subscription SaaS β€” unavoidable for this product type, but no annual discount or one-time option is surfaced to soften the commitment.

Fix: Surface the annual plan discount prominently in pricing ('Save 20% annually') to frame the subscription as a smarter one-time decision.

28. CTA says what happens next βœ— 0/3

Primary CTAs are 'Open app', 'Log in', 'Sign up' β€” generic and interchangeable. 'Sign up' tells you nothing about what happens in the next 60 seconds. 'Open app' implies you already have an account.

Fix: Change primary CTA to 'Start your free workspace' or 'Set up Linear in 2 minutes' β€” specific, time-bounded, action-oriented.

29. Has testimonials β—‹ 2/3

blockquotes = 3 and testimonialMarkup = true β€” there are real testimonials with markup. avatarsGuess = 386 suggests customer logos or many social proof signals. Solid.

Fix: Ensure at least one testimonial appears above the first fold, not buried after five feature sections.

30. Ten-word description β—‹ 2/3

Meta description 'Purpose-built for planning and building products with AI agents' is 9 words β€” technically compliant. But 'planning and building products' is vague. The H1 is 11 words and more specific.

Fix: Sharpen to: 'The AI-native system for shipping software, fast.' β€” 8 words, concrete.

31. Priced above competitors β—‹ 2/3

Pricing signals show $200 as a high-end figure, suggesting enterprise tier exists. No 'cheapest' or 'affordable' language is visible. The premium positioning ('new standard', 'world-class') supports higher pricing. Cannot confirm exact competitor comparison from data.

Fix: Add a brief positioning line near pricing: 'Built for teams who value speed over saving $10/month.' Signals premium without arrogance.

How would your page score?

Same 31 principles. Same brutal honesty. Free.

Grade My Page